There has been a lot of publicity over the shooting in Aurora Colorado but that wasn’t the only shooting there. There was another shooting that has never got the publicity as the one at the movie theater. There was a shooting at a church prior to the one at the movie theater.
Oh, you never heard about this shooting? No!!!, I wonder why?
Could it be because there was only one victim at this shooting while there was twelve victims at the shooting by the theater? Not enough blood for it to go mainstream.
Could it be racial discrimination on the part of the liberal mainstream media since the victim at the church was black?
Could it be that the shooter was killed by a gun totin, Bible thumpin’, member of the church before anyone else could be victimized by this shooter and that does not fit the liberal argument for gun control laws?
Could it be that the theater was a government designated gun free zone while the church was not thus permitting people to be armed and ready to protect themselves at the church when there was a need but not at the theater?
Could it be if people had learned the right lesson from this incident the incident at the theater would not have been so disasterous?
People, you have a choice. Where would you rather be with your loved ones when someone decides to use a gun indiscriminately as both of these incidences declares, at a gun free area or where you can carry a gun to defend yourself if a shooting occurs?
Taken together both of these incidences shows the value of gun control laws and their ability to protect lives. they have little value. It also makes one wonder what is the real reason liberals want only the government to possess arms and not the people.