as the dictator of the united states of america i would…(Part III)


As grandpa continued you could visually see the stunned look of his friend. For you could see that he never expected to hear what he was hearing from grandpa.

“I would then mandate that the 16th amendment to the federal constitution be repealed. This amendment has done more harm than any other law on the books in my opinion. Before I go any further I wish to clarify that I have nothing against the taxation of income. If we recognize the need of a government then taxes are inevitable. In fact I’ll be on record as saying that taxes should be the only source of revenue for governments.

All taxes regardless of how they are described are taxes on income. And all income is a derivative of profits. Since governments cannot produce a profit then the only means for governments to get revenue must come from private enterprise. So, what is my problem?

My problem lies in the tax code itself. The federal government as well as the State governments have created a code that is so complicated that no one can say that they understand it. This be the one thing that everyone can agree on regardless of political ideology. And once you create laws that cannot be understood in their entirety you create a fertile ground for abuse of the system.

Another problem is enforceability of the law. If laws cannot be enforced as intended then injustice results. Even in the enforcement of these laws the whole idea of the meaning of justice in this nation is turned upside down. For these laws when enforced presumes guilt until innocence is proven. That is the whole purpose behind the idea of keeping financial records for a certain number of years, as proof of innocence. A person should not need to prove their innocence of any charge of illegal activity. It is the obligation of the State to prove a person guilty.

Most important reason of all is affordability. As the tax code is written now affordability is assumed without any real basis in fact other than a general assumption. Affordability can only be defined in terms relative to each person’s situation. It cannot be defined in terms of the collective average.

Persons with the same amount of income can have different levels of affordability. And the reason for this is that the cost of living is determined by the individual needs not by the needs of the collective. Another determinant of affordability is the locale in which a person resides. It is a known fact that in any country as large as the United States the cost of living is different for many locales.

Financial obligations are another factor in affordability. Persons of the same income level may have different obligations thus effecting their ability to afford the paying of any tax imposition. This creates a need to prioritize obligations. And I think everyone can agree that a person’s personal obligation to himself as well as to his family should be given priority over his obligation to the State.

This is not the case as the law now imposes a tax obligation upon the taxpayer. Payroll deduction of taxes declare that a taxpayer’s first obligation is to the State. I’ll grant the reason for payroll deduction of taxes but it does not change the end result of it as it giving priority to the State. And if we recognize that then we will recognize the need to change the system so that it gives priority to the taxpayer’s needs.

Last but not least of my reasons for the repeal of this amendment can be found in the first part of this series. It would force the federal government to collect taxes only as the federal constitution permits it to thus require that people view the constitution from a historical context of power divided and not from an ideological context of power authorized.

Now, these are but a few reasons that I have for this action. I could stand here all day and give reason after reason and I have no doubt that you could give a few yourself but this is the primary gist behind it.”

Advertisements
Categories: Economics, My Personal Philosophy of Life, Politics | Tags: , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Post navigation

2 thoughts on “as the dictator of the united states of america i would…(Part III)

  1. BB-Idaho

    Well golly gee, Grandpa…you get a new stent and become a dictator? BTW, can
    you summarily declare an extra holiday or two? 🙂

  2. The Griper

    mmm, seems like i just gave everyone the best kind of holiday in this post, a tax holiday, didn’t i, BB? 🙂

    btw, woke up in the hospital and found out i got a couple of stents put in, one on each side.

    as for the dictator idea, got that from all of the political blogs and politicians. everyone seems to think that they and only they know what is best for the people. so, i decided to do it too. and when you place what some of them say in a dictator format,,some of what they say can be mighty scary, especially the negativity.

Be respecful or your comment will be deleted. Also know that Alinsky tactics do not phase me

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: